--- In [email protected], "llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Fuck it, you're on spam list Jim. Later. Maybe next life I'll read
you
> again. Useless, waste of reading you are.
>
***********
from NYT Tech columnist
1. From the Desk of David Pogue: Whatever Happened to Online
Etiquette?
==========================================================
"Dear David, first off i would like to tell you that you are
full of **** and did not research the zune enough to know
your facts. The following are incorrect, and not limited to:
podcasts, giftcards, looks(which is an oppinion), controls,
and content. Also i would like to inform you that on the day
of the launch(nov 14) there is a sceduled firmware upgrade
which will most likely disband the 3 by 3 rule [which limits
songs beamed between Zunes to three playbacks within three
days], and the zune marketplace is also to offer video
content about one month after launch. In my oppinion you
should be fired for wrighting such a biast article in a
(somewhat)professional newspaper. Oh and in case you think i
work for microsoft or have bad grammar, or something, you
should know that im 15!"
The deeper we sail into the new online world of
communications, the sadder I get about its future.
I'm OK with criticism, I'm fine with disagreement, I'm
perfectly capable of handling angry mail. That's not the
issue here (although my teenage correspondent above was, in
fact, wrong about every single one of his points).
I've even accepted personal attacks as part of the job. I'm a
columnist; the heat comes with the kitchen.
But what's really stunning is how hostile *ordinary* people
are to each other online these days.
Slashdot and Digg.com are extremely popular sites for tech
fans. Each discussion begins with the presentation of an
article or Web page--and then opens up the floor for
discussion.
Lately, an increasing number of the discussions devolve into
name-calling and bickering. Someone might submit, say, this
item to Digg:
685 diggs. "AWESOME astronomy poem." (posted by MetsFan 3
days ago)
Twinkle, twinkle, little star, how I wonder what you are.
Up above the world so high, like a diamond in the sky,
Twinkle, twinkle, little star, how I wonder what you are.
Before long, the people's feedback begins, like this:
by baddude on 12/11/06
What's yr problem, moron. You already said it's a star, why
would you then wonder what it is. Get a clue, or a life.
by neverland2 on 12/11/06
Dugg down as inaccurate. Stars do not twinkle. It's the
shifting atmosphere that causes an apparent twinkle. Or were
you stoned all through science class?
by mrobe on 12/11/06
yo neverland2--It's a poem, idiot. Nobody's claiming that
stars twinkle. Ever heard of poetic license?
Honestly, the intellectual level of you people is right up
there with a gnat's.
..and so on.
What's worse is that the concentration of the nasty people
increases as the civil ones get fed up and leave.
What's going on here?
My current theories:
* On the Internet, you're anonymous. Since you don't have to
face the person you're dumping on, you don't see any reason
to display courtesy.
* On the Internet, you're anonymous. You worry that your
comments might get lost in the shuffle, so you lay it on
thick to enhance your noticeability.
* The open toxicity is all part of the political climate.
We've learned from the Red state-Blue state talking heads
that open hostility can pass for meaningful conversation.
* Young people who spend lots of time online are, in essence,
replacing in-person social interactions with these online
exchanges. With so much less experience conversing in the
real world, they haven't picked up on the value of treating
people civilly. That is, they haven't yet hit the stage of
life when getting things like friends, a spouse and a job
depend on what kind of person you are.
* Many parents haven't been teaching social skills (or
haven't been around to teach them) for years, but Web 2.0 is
suddenly making it apparent for the first time. ("Web 2.0"
describes sites like Digg and Slashdot, where the audience
itself provides material for the Web site.)
I'd give just about anything to hear what 15-year-old Josh's
parents would say if they knew how little respect he holds
for adults (let alone the English language). Then again,
maybe they wouldn't be surprised a bit.
The real shame, though, is that the kneejerk "everyone else
is an idiot" tenor is poisoning the potential the Internet
once had. People used to dream of a global village, where
maybe we can work out our differences, where direct
communication might make us realize that we have a lot in
common after all, no matter where we live or what our
beliefs.
But instead of finding common ground, we're finding new ways
to spit on the other guy, to push them away. The Internet is
making it easier to attack, not to embrace.
Maybe as the Internet becomes as predominant as air, somebody
will realize that online behavior isn't just an afterthought.
Maybe, along with HTML and how to gauge a Web site's
credibility, schools and colleges will one day realize that
there's something else to teach about the Internet: Civility
101.
