--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> authfriend wrote:
> > --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> wrote:
> >   
> >> authfriend wrote:
> >>     
> >>> --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> 
wrote:
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>>> authfriend wrote:
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>>>> --- In [email protected], Bhairitu <noozguru@> 
> >>>>>           
> > wrote:
> >   
> >>>>>   
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>>>> Jeff Fischer wrote:
> >>>>>>     
> >>>>>>         
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>>>> --- In [email protected], "Hagen J. Holtz" 
> >>>>>>> <hagen.j.holtz@> wrote:
> >>>>>>>   
> >>>>>>> Vegetarians are more intelligent.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> How many here are vegetarians?  Vegans?
> >>>>>>> I'm not.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>           
> >>>>>>>               
> >>>>>> Studies like these don't take into account biochemical 
> >>>>>> individuality and should be disregarded as a reason for
> >>>>>> anyone to switch their diet.   Go by ayurveda or metabolic
> >>>>>> typing instead.
> >>>>>>         
> >>>>>>             
> >>>>> The point of the study was that more intelligent
> >>>>> people are more likely to chose to be vegetarians,
> >>>>> not that being a vegetarian makes you more
> >>>>> intelligent.
> >>>>>       
> >>>>>           
> >>>> That's how you construe the article but I see nothing
> >>>> that says that.
> >>>>         
> >>> Read it again:
> >>>
> >>> http://tinyurl.com/y6hj8h
> >>>
> >>> Here's another article on the same study:
> >>>
> >>> http://tinyurl.com/yljk43
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> I was referring to the first article and found a few
> >> minutes ago when looking at Yahoo.
> >>     
> >
> > The second URL above is the Yahoo article.  The
> > first article is the first URL above.  Both of them
> > are reporting on the same study.
> >
> >   I think the Yahoo
> >   
> >> byline is a little misleading and would dispute that
> >> is the point of the research but that it was one 
> >> theory expounded.
> >>     
> >
> > No, that *was* the point of the research.  It isn't
> > a matter of opinion.  See the British Medical
> > Journal, where the study was published:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/yc4865
> >
> > "Conclusion: Higher scores for IQ in childhood are
> > associated with an increased likelihood of being a
> > vegetarian as an adult."
> >
> > The Yahoo story headline:
> >
> > "Kids With High IQs Grow Up to Be Vegetarians"
> >
> > The headline is on the nose, not at all misleading.
> >
> >   
> >>>> Truly intelligent people seek the correct diet for their body.
> >>>>         
> >>> Right.  The study looked only at vegetarians vs.
> >>> non-vegetarians, but it found that the vegetarians
> >>> had been more intelligent as children than the
> >>> nonvegetarians.
> >>>
> >>> As I said, it wasn't about trying to convince
> >>> people to become vegetarians so they would be
> >>> more intelligent.  The vegetarians were more
> >>> intelligent to start with, as children.
> >>>       
> >> Yes but some people will use it as an excuse and
> >> wind up sick as a result.
> >
> > Non sequitur.
>
> You're nuts.

Uh, no.  What you say may be true, but it isn't
relevant to the study, nor to your misconception
as to what it was about.



Reply via email to