--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Dec 19, 2006, at 4:51 AM, TurquoiseB wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], "george_deforest" > > <george.deforest@> wrote: > >> > >> Ther is no one > >> party rule. That means the national consciousness is in > >> a very bad situation, is very unlucky, is very unfortunate. > > > > Kinda settles the issue of where Maharishi stands > > politically, doesn't it? > > Vedic Communism.
Heehee. Might want to bone up a bit on the definition of communism, Vaj. Hint: it isn't synonymous with one-party rule. > Although instead of coming in the middle of the night to > haul you off to a gulag, they come to check your wallpaper. And pacifist instead of militaristic. Terrible, just terrible.
