--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Dec 22, 2006, at 10:21 AM, bmorry2000 wrote: > > > > > > > Anyone can be accepted onto any TMO course if you tell > > > > them what they want to hear. As MMY always said, "Speak > > > > the sweet truth." > > > > > > > > As a Governor, I have been accepted to Mother Divine, CCP, > > > > WPAs, and every course I wanted to attend using this > > > > technique. The last application I completed did not even > > > > ask me if I was a teacher of other techniques (yes, I am), > > > > had seen a psychiatrist (yes), had seen saints (as many as > > > > possible when they travel near my location), consulted non- > > > > TMO Ayurvedic practitioners (of course--they are so much > > > > cheaper)..... > > > > > > > > If you want to be in the dome, get with this program--it > > > > has worked for me and many others for years. > > > > > > > > The TMO does not care about you personally; they are all > > > > about image! > > > > > > Encouraging people to lie because there's no other way to > > > get on a course--and one supposedly about promoting "world > > > peace" no less-- is about as low as you can go, ethically > > > at least. Good luck with that. > > > > I won't get into the ethical issues of having to > > lie to follow one's spiritual path. I just feel > > badly for the traditions that make it necessary > > for most of their adherents to lie to follow > > their spiritual path. > > > Just as you said it was a choice to be offended, isn't it also a > choice to see it as a lie?
You took the words right off my keyboard. (But then, hypocrisy and self-contradiction must be in the eye of the beholder too, right?)
