--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: <snip> > > From the vedic point of view, however, we can see the interplay > > of the gunas and how they manifested among the Eloi and the > > Murlocks. We see the struggle between good and evil, which is > > very similar to the struggle between the demigods and the demons > > in the vedic literature. The story even today has an inherent > > appeal. > > Just as a point, John, some of us here don't see > the world in terms of the TM buzzword "vedic."
Just as a point, Barry, John didn't say you did, or even that you should. > As I think I said in my initial reply, anyone > can project onto a well-told story anything they > want to see in it. The fact that they see it there > does not, however, mean that the author intended > it to be there. Nor did John suggest he did. Why are you so threatened by his point of view? Why couldn't you just have offered your own without trying to imply that John was attempting to impose his perspective on everyone else?
