--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], bob_brigante <no_reply@> 
wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], 
[email protected] 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > 
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > This email message is a notification to let you know that
> > > a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the FairfieldLife 
> > > group.
> > > 
> > >   File        : /File0001.jpg 
> > >   Uploaded by : bob_brigante 
> > >   Description : WSJ review of Lynch book, film 
> > > 
> > > You can access this file at the URL:
> > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/files/File0001.jpg 
> > > 
> > > To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
> > > http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/files
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > bob_brigante
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > *********
> > 
> > I changed the file name to: WSJ on Lynch (last file on page) -- 
> > mostly negative review of Lynch's book, movie
> >
> 

> People feel much the same way about his work as he does about David 
Lynch's it seems:
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Monkey
>

***********

I never saw the show, but the fact that it failed to capture the 
attention of the masses does not mean it was no good. One of the 
funniest shows ever done, Get a life ( 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Get_a_Life_(TV_series) ), was cancelled 
in favor of the usual sitcom drivel that droolers go for. In any 
event, more to the point, Kyle Smith's review of Lynch's work does 
make some valid points and is coherent, although certainly harsh. 

At least TM fans can be glad that shock jock Howard Stern does 
everybody a favor and does not talk much about TM, since the weird 
and tasteless endorsing TM is probably not all that useful for the 
movement. I guess Lynch's fan base will care about his favorable 
attitude toward TM and others will just ignore him.

Reply via email to