--- In [email protected], "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- bob_brigante wrote: > > > > > File : /File0001.jpg > > > Uploaded by : bob_brigante > > > Description : WSJ review of Lynch book, film > > > > > > You can access this file at the URL: > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/files/File0001.jpg > > > > > I changed the file name to: WSJ on Lynch (last file on page) -- > > mostly negative review of Lynch's book, movie > > What are other critics saying about Lynch's book > and movie? I used to read the Wall Street Journal > in the 1980s, and was consistently struck by how > square and unperceptive the reviews were. The Journal's > reporting was sparkling and witty, the opinions > made conservatism a joy to embrace, but the arts > critics were clods. >
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/inland_empire/ 61% of critics find it worth watching. 38% of the "cream of the crop" find it worth watching. My favorite quote (not from the 'cream'): "INLAND EMPIRE is 172 minutes of exhausting, patience-shredding, yet continually intriguing filmmaking, a work that will divide fans and critics and probably lead to a few isolated instances of marital discord." --Jeremy C. Fox Pajiba
