--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > ...and I have never > > > > > > been nominated for Usenet Kook of the Year. :-) > > > > > > > > > > By Sherilyn, one of her more desperate moves. > > > > > > > > I wouldn't worry about it that much. You only > > > > got about 40 votes, mainly from your "fans" on > > > > alt.meditation.transcendental and sci.skeptic. > > > > > > Um, I never worried about it at all. But > > > apparently it was a big enough deal for you > > > that you actually had to go count the votes. > > > > Nope. Someone on sci.skeptic kept track. > > You had to go search sci.skeptic to find out > how many votes I'd gotten?? Jeez. > > > They were > > quite amused by you. > > > > I presume they were all "angry and usually dishonest > > critics of TM," too? :-) > > The folks on sci.skeptic who weren't former > TMers were very largely ignorant of TM and > tended to bash TM and TMers just on principle, > so, yes, they were intellectually dishonest, > if not personally angry at TM/the TMO/MMY.
I think we understand, Judy...you've been saying the same thing for over a decade. Anyone who doesn't do TM is ignorant. It's the TMO version of "humility." :-)
