--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 4, 2007, at 2:30 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > >> > >> --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Jan 4, 2007, at 10:16 AM, sparaig wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Yeah, but the rationale for the ME precludes the radiating of > >>>> disharmonious states. > >>> > >>> I don't accept that: we radiate our own states constantly, > >>> negative, positive or neutral, it doesn't matter. > >> > >> Gotta go with Vaj on this one. > > > > See my earlier response. All states might indeed be radiated, but > > only those that are > > harmonious can create the "constructive interference" that the ME > > is supposed to work on > > (assuming that the analogy to physical systems is correct, of course). > > > It's merely an analogy. Early MIU textbooks on physics (which were > self-published) detailed these analogies but then in a responsible > fashion gave a concluding chapter which stated these were just > analogies and 'you can only take analogies so far.' However I > wouldn't be surprised if the map had become the territory given the > cultish setting of the TMO. >
Yeah, but the concept of constructive interference is the quintessence of the analogy. There's no analogy whatsoever if this part isn't correct in some respect. There's no "taking it too far" since if that part isn't right, there's nothing to take anywhere...
