--- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Robert Gimbel" <babajii_99@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > In case you missed it - Iran has been "taking it out" on the US and > > > the world since 1979. > > > > > > The situation today is that the US and the World is damned if they > > > attack Iran and damned if they don't. > > > > > > Let's just hope that whatever happens, it is the lesser of the evils > > > at hand. > > > > > > > > There is a lot of dissent in Iraq, right now, particularly with the > > younger people there, and woman's rights and all of that. > > It seems that a greater push should be given to support the dissent > > within the country; in the same way we could have perhaps dealt with > > Iraq, before we invaded it. > > What makes you think that the Bush-administration in a few months in > the spring of 2007 will excel in a type of military operation the US > has failed in since the Vietnam war? > > The DNA strain required to understand counterinsurgency is apparently > not part of the American gene pool. > > > Bombing Iran, would be the worse solution, according to many analysts; > > And would only feed the hatred, and the apocalyptic visions of many > > of the radicals; and would inflame Islam world-wide. > > What today counts is not the presence of intent (the hatred can't be > any stronger than it already is), but the growing capabilities and > aboundant opportunities of Radical Islam (led by Iran) to hurt the > rest of the World. > > Take Iran out of the picture and three immediate accomplishments are > reached: (1) the so-called palestinian question ceases to be an issue; > (2) lebanon becomes a sovereign state; (3) the world's flow of oil out > of the Persian Gulf is secured. > > Failing an MMY solution to this challenge, logic suggest that a world > leader caught up in this malstroem of Evil, and which choses to do > something about it, should play on it's strengths when dealing with > this regime. > > In short, nuke Shiite Iran back to neolithicum. >
And the Iraqi Shi'ites will appreciate this because...?
