--- In [email protected], "llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That was really hilarious and worth millions in Raams.
Happy to see you got it. :-) > I am just saying is that you and your two pals from AMT like > best to embellish threads with your personal views without > really ever attempting to reply to a thread. It's like you > guys are an assembly line of bullshit, where right after > the frame is installed you few people put glaring accessories > on it, before the vehicle has been fully assembled, thus the > whole thread usually is either destroyed, or must be placed > back on track... So you're saying that if someone starts a thread asking what the mechanics are of how a bullock cart does 100mph and I'm pretty certain that a bullock cart *can't* do 100mph, I'm not allowed to state that? :-) You started a thread that *assumed* that yagyas worked. My comments were based on not accepting that assumption. Sorry if you were offended. The rest of your comments seemed like you just needed to rant and weren't really relevant, so I won't bother with them. > ...the accessories placed have become so by rote > that they are predictable, also similar like spam, but selling > nothing of note, but merely making the mistake that someone > gives some shit about flyaway opinions and gossip and slander. > You guys are vomitious. Not everyone, just the few of you who > can't prevent your kneejerk reactions to everything and so who > always ruin their own writing by prematurely ejaculating your > personal plots upon everything like graffitti. I hope you guys > are fucking happy with yourselves because I personally think > that finding value in your words is like trying to find the > needle. So enfuckingjoy yourselves. But you guys are mainly > totally fucking useless. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "TurquoiseB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 11:20 AM > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Mechanics of Yagyas > > > > --- In [email protected], "llundrub" <llundrub@> wrote: > >> > >> We already know what you think in spades Turq so how about > >> not also hijacking this thread with personal opinions. If > >> people don't like pundits, vedas, or divine intercession > >> then I suggest they stay the fuck off of this thread. > > > > If you want this so badly, why don't you hire someone > > to pray to the gods to make it happen? > > > > :-) > > > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "TurquoiseB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 9:52 AM > >> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Mechanics of Yagyas > >> > >> > >> > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I don't get this either. Teaching is a job- an exalted one, > >> >> but none the less still a job. Teachers should get paid, > >> >> and paid as well as any other profession. > >> > > >> > I disagree, and covered why in an earlier post. > >> > > >> >> Perhaps Barry is being influenced by his experience with > >> >> Fred Lenz, who very much exploited his followers in > >> >> every way possible, and definitely leeched off of them > >> >> for money. > >> > > >> > While this is somewhat true, he is also one of > >> > teachers who never allowed his own students to > >> > teach for money, and insisted they do it for free, > >> > out of a sense of selfless service. I am the first > >> > to agree that his life might have turned out differ- > >> > ently if he had walked his own talk. In many ways. > >> > > >> >> That would leave a bad taste in anyone's mouth, though > >> >> its quite a leap to then say teaching for money is > >> >> somehow less clean. Transactions for money are as clean > >> >> or as dirty as we make them. > >> > > >> > We must agree to disagree.
