"jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: To: <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 4:09 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Israel Drawing Plans for Iran Attack'
--- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "larry.potter" > <larry.potter@> wrote: > > > > From: <MDixon6569@> wrote: > > > > > > > > In a message dated 1/10/07 12:02:41 P.M. Central Standard Time, > > > jflanegi@ writes: > > > > > > Take a chill pill. I sincerely doubt Iran would ever invade or > > > attack Israel. The rhetoric from their prez is spun to make it > > seem > > > that way, but it ain't gonna happen. As usual, the US is scaring > > the > > > crap out of some country, and when the country reacts, we say "Oh > > > they are getting ready for an attack!". The only two countries in > > > the last ten years to invade other countries are the US and > > Israel. > > > > > > > >> > > > Yeah, I'll take a chill pill but you need a reality check. > > Hezzbola and > > > Hamas picked a fight with Israel this past summer who were > > supported directly by > > > Iran probably for the purpose of getting Iran and their nuclear > > program off > > > the front pages while the E 8 met in Moscow. No, Iran isn't going > > to invade > > > Israel, not with an American army in between them and not when > > they have their > > > proxy Hezzbola to do it for them. > > >> > > > > > > Jim also "forgets" that the recent Israel-Lebanon war occurred after > > Lebanon via Hezbollah invaded Israel and started a war cycle. > > > > "The conflict began when Hezbollah fired Katyusha rockets and > > mortars at Israeli military positions and border villages, diverting > > attention from another Hezbollah unit that crossed the border and > > abducted two Israeli soldiers and killed three others.[1] Israeli > > troops attempted to rescue the abducted soldiers but were > > unsuccessful. > > .. > > > > On 11 August 2006, the United Nations Security Council unanimously > > approved UN Resolution 1701 in an effort to end the hostilities. The > > resolution, which was approved by both Lebanese and Israeli > > governments the following days, called for disarmament of Hezbollah, > > for withdrawal of Israel from Lebanon... " (wikipedia.org) > > > > Israel kept it's part of the 1701 resolution, while Hezbollah > > didn't, in fact every day under the eye of the UN, Hezbollah is > > getting weapons mainly from Iran and Syria. > > > > Absolutely, though I think more approriate would be to say that the > Israeli defense kicked into action AFTER Iran via Hezbollah - with the > government and people of Lebanon as hostages - embarked on > indiscriminate killing by shooting rockets into Israel. > << I draw my conclusions partly from the numbers of dead. Israel though they have a much better PR engine kills ten to one hundred times more enemies than their enemies do of them, yet they always position themselves as the victims. >> Israel PR sux, it's also a matter of size, Israel can't compete with all the many hatrade contries PR machines. You tend to ignore pure FACTS and you using "funny logic" is not helping, meaning, just becuase Israel happened to have less dead count in this war does not mean that they are responsible for Hezbollah attack on them.
