--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], off_world_beings <no_reply@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Ok, if you are in France Turquoise B, then you just posted > > > > a post at 3 o'clock in the morning. If you are not a drunk > > > > staying up to 3am and posting, are you an insomniac? > > > > > > Off, first you can't spell, and now it seems you > > > can't tell time, either. I was up late last night, > > > working on a project that's due this morning, but > > > you're considerably...uh...Off in your estimates. > > > Yahoo says that my last post was at 12:39. > > > > That's what Yahoo says *now*. But was it what Yahoo > > said when Off made his post? > > > > I mean, you're known to cancel posts that you find > > to be "inconvenient" in one way or another. > > I see. So you're saying that I, afraid that someone > would discover that I'd been posting late at night, > canceled those posts and then went back in time and > sent the one that Off quoted in *his* post *in the > past*, so it would bear the Yahoo timestamp of 11:32 > that it has now. Did I get that right?
No, you didn't. You continue to have difficulty discerning the difference between an *assertion* and a *question*. My point was, of course, that since you're known to cancel "inconvenient" posts, and since you're known to be dishonest generally, one can't take your assertions at face value.
