--- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <peterklutz@>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In [email protected], "suziezuzie" <msilver1951@>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > When someone starts meditating, is the flatness (separation
> of Self 
> > > > > > from sense perception) that they begin to feel is a prelude to
> > > Cosmic 
> > > > > > Consciousness or the beginnings of personality pathology
> that has 
> > > > > > nothing to do with enlightenment?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > It is the beginning of CC.
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > The perception that you are outside your body is a pathological
> > > thing. CC isn't the same.
> > > >
> > > 
> > > I see that you have already been sorted out by someone else for your
> > > faulty reply, so I'll just make the observation that you would have
> > > spared yourself the embarrassment if you have taken the time to
> > > actually read the post you replied to before replying.
> > > 
> > > The issue you responded to is "beginning of CC" - not CC per se.
> > > 
> > > Not that it matters, you're wrong anyway.
> > > 
> > > Moreover, as you approach CC it's more about the body being external
> > > to You, rather than the way you choose to misconstrue it.
> > >
> > 
> > There's no internal OR external.
> >
> 
> Thanks for proving that (1) not only do you not know what you are a
> communicating about; but also (2) are you unable to read; or (3) your
> ego is so damaged by the feedback you have gotten in this thread that
> you start to purposely misrepresent the postings of others.
>

Huh. You said: 

as you approach CC, it's more about the body being external to You, rather than 
the way 
you choose to misconstrue it.

I said:

There's no internal OR external.


That sums up the last exchange, right? Now, the question arises: do YOU 
understand what 
I said?



Reply via email to