Islam's Sunni-Shiite split By Dan Murphy, Staff writer of The 
Christian Science Monitor 
Wed Jan 17, 3:00 AM ET
 


To the outsider, the differences between the Sunni and Shiite Islamic 
sects are hard to recognize. 

The five pillars of Islam - daily prayer; fasting during Ramadan; 
alms giving; the pilgrimage to Mecca; and belief in one, unitary god -
 are at the core of both faiths, and most mainstream clerics in each 
denomination recognize adherents of the other side as "legitimate" 
Muslims.

The Koran is the sacred text for both. They believe Muhammad was the 
prophet and that there will be a resurrection followed by a final 
judgment when the world ends.

Adding to the potential confusion is the insistence of many Muslims 
not to be identified as Shiite or Sunni, saying they are Muslims and 
Muslims only.

But, as recent events in        Iraq and Lebanon have shown, the 
differences between the believers are not only seen as important by 
the communities but now, as they have for centuries, rest at the core 
of bloody political struggles.

While there are superficial differences between the sects - 
differences in prayer and carrying out ritual ablutions, for 
instance - the arena of conflict between the two has long been 
political.

The split between the two main branches of Islam is nearly 1,400 
years old, and started with a fight over who should lead the faithful 
after the prophet Muhammad's death in 632. One side believed that 
direct descendants of the prophet should take up the mantle of the 
caliph - the leader of the world's faithful. They were known as the 
Shiat-Ali, or "partisans of Ali," after the prophet's cousin and son-
in-law Ali, whom they favored to become caliph. In time, they came 
simply to be known as Shiites.

The other side, the Sunnis, thought that any worthy man could lead 
the faithful, regardless of lineage, and favored Abu Bakr, an early 
convert to Islam who had married into Muhammad's family. "Sunni" is 
derived from the Arab word for "followers" and is shorthand 
for "followers of the prophet."

The Shiites were the eventual losers in a violent struggle for 
mastery that lasted decades, a fact now reflected in their minority 
status within global Islam.

But while the civil war now raging between Shiite and Sunni in Iraq 
is sometimes cast as an extension of this age-old religious struggle, 
today's conflict is about something slightly different.

While religious differences are real and remain important, the 
breakdown over Shiite and Sunni in Iraq is about group identity as 
much as it is about disagreements over proper worship.

In Iraq, many Sunnis and Shiites who are not particularly devout are 
participating in the bloodshed, fighting to advance group interests.

"I think that Sunni and Shiite group identifiers have become more 
important in a lot of ways that are not essentially religious,'' says 
Barbara Petzen, an expert at Harvard University's Middle Eastern 
Studies Center.

Nevertheless, there are some key religious differences. Shiite 
veneration of the holy family, that is, the descendants of Muhammad, 
has contributed to a much more centralized and hierarchical clergy 
than in the Sunni world.

All religious Shiites nominally observe the advice of an ayatollah on 
how to follow the law of Islam, or ~~i~~sharia~~/i~~, in the modern 
context. For many in Iraq, this role is fulfilled by Ayatollah Ali al-
Sistani.

Sunni Islam is much less centralized. In this respect, the 
differences between Sunni and Shiite Islam superficially approach the 
differences between the Roman Catholic Church and most Protestant 
denominations.

Though a majority in        Iran and Iraq, Shiites make up just 15 
percent of the world's Muslims. Their history of defeat and frequent 
subjugation has also led to a cult of death and martyrdom within 
Shiism.

The major Shiite holidays celebrate the glorious defeats and 
martyrdoms of Imam Ali and Imam Hussein, Ali's son, as typified by 
the preeminent Shiite holiday of Ashura, which marks the slaughter of 
Hussein and his followers outside the Iraqi city of Karbala by a 
Sunni caliph in 680. 

In Iraq and Iran, the holiday is marked by elaborate processions of 
men reenacting their own passion play, many of whom self-flagellate 
with chains to the beat of drums. 

Such expressions of piety are looked at with disgust by hard-line 
Sunnis like the clergy in Saudi Arabia, who view the veneration of 
Hussein and other members of the prophet's family as a violation of 
monotheism. This view has frequently led extremist groups like Al 
Qaeda to attack Shiites as heretics. 

The fact that Shiites have long been oppressed - first under the 
Ottoman Empire, later under states like Iraq and Saudi Arabia - has 
led to a strong identification with the injustices suffered by 
Hussein, and have lent a political dimension to Shiite worship. 
Ashura celebrations, for instance, were banned under        Saddam 
Hussein, who feared they could lead to spontaneous uprisings. 

One of the most important distinctions between Shiite and Sunni 
belief is veneration of the imams. 

Most Shiites believe that there were 12 legitimate successors to 
Muhammad as caliph, and that the final imam, now called the Mahdi, 
disappeared when he was taken up in the arms of God. Many Shiites 
believe the Mahdi will return to earth one day and play the role of 
savior. A battle between the forces of good and evil will ensue, 
ending in a thousand-year reign of peace and the end of the world. 

In practice, this leads to occasionally apocalyptic rhetoric from 
leaders like Iraq's Moqtada al-Sadr and Iranian President Mahmoud 
Ahmedinejad. 



Reply via email to