2.45 The word Traigunya means the three Gunas --- Sattva, Rajas and
Tamas. Here the term Traigunya denotes persons in whom Sattva, Rajas
and Tamas are in abundance. The Vedas in prescribing desire-oriented
rituals (Kamya-karmas) have such persons in view. Because of their
great love, the Vedas teach what is good to those in whom Tamas,
Rajas and Sattva preponderate. If the Vedas had not explained to these
persons the means for the attainment of heaven etc., according to the
Gunas, then those persons who are not interested in liberation owing to
absence of Sattva and preponderance of Rajas and Tamas in them,
would get completely lost amidst what should not be resorted to,
without knowing the means for attaining the results they desire. Hence
the Vedas are concerned with the Gunas. Be you free from the three
Gunas. Try to acquire Sattva in abundance; increase that alone. The
purport is: do not nurse the preponderance of the three Gunas in their
state of inter-mixture; do not cultivate such preponderance. Be free
from the pairs of opposites; be free from all the characteristics of
worldly
life. Abide in pure Sattva; be established in Sattva, in its state of
purity
without the admixture of the other two Gunas. If it is questioned how
that is possible, the reply is as follows. Never care to acquire
things nor
protect what has been acquired. While abandoning the acquisition of
what is not required for self-realisation, abandon also the
conservation of
such things already acquired. You can thus be established in self-control
and thereby become an aspirant after the essentail nature of the self.
'Yoga' is acquisition of what has not been acquired; 'Ksema' is
preservation of things already acquired. Abandoning these is a must for
an aspirant after the essential nature of the self. If you conduct
yourself
in this way, the preponderance of Rajas and Tamas will be annihilated,
and pure Sattva will develop. Besides, all that is taught in the Vedas is
not fit to be utilised by all.


..2.45..trayo guNAH traiguNyaM sattvarajastamAMsi;
sattvarajastamaHpracurAH puruSAH traiguNyashabdena ucyante. tadviSayA
vedAH; tamaHpracurANAM rajaHpracurANAM sattvapracurANAM ca
vatsalataratayA eva hitam avabodhayanti vedAH. yadi eSAM
svaguNAnuguNyena svargAdisAdhanam eva hitaM na avabodhayanti,
tadA eva te rajastamaHpracuratayA sAttvikaphalamokSavimukhAH
svApekSitaphalasAdhanam ajAnantaH kAmaprAvaNyavivashA anupAyeSu
upAyabhrAntyA praviSTAH praNaSTA bhaveyuH. ataH traiguNyaviSayA
vedAH; tvaM tu nistraiguNyo bhava, idAnIM sattvapracuraH tvaM tadeva
vardhaya; nAnyonyasaMkIrNaguNatrayapracuro bhava. na tatprAcuryaM
vardhaya ityarthaH nirdvandvaH nirgatasakalasAMsArikasvabhAvaH.
nityasattvasthaH guNadvayarahitanityaprav¤ddhasattvastho bhava.
katham? iti cet, niryogakSemaH
AtmasvarUpatatprAptyupAyabahirbhUtAnAm arthAnAM yogaM
prAptAnAM ca kSemaM paripAlanaM parityajya AtmavAn bhava,
AtmasvarUpAnveSaNaparo bhava. aprAptasya prAptiH yogaH, prAptasya
parirakSaNaM kSemaH. evaM vartamAnasya te rajastamaH pracuratA
nashyati sattvaM ca vardhate. na ca vedoditaM sarvaM sarvasya
upAdeyam --
..2.46..yathA sarvA







Reply via email to