Columns
   
  Point of View

History’s course in America 
Monday January 22 2007 14:08 IST 

T J S George
   
  The Arawaks of Bahamas whom Columbus called “Indians” were described by him 
as “well-built, with good bodies and handsome features. They do not bear arms, 
do not know them — with fifty men, we could subjugate them all.” He did. The 
Arawaks were ordered to bring gold from the riverbeds. Those who brought any 
were given copper tokens to hang around their necks. Later those found without 
a copper token had their hands cut off and bled to death. 
  
The Bahamas were not gold country and the Europeans soon tired of killing the 
locals. The Arawaks were then taken as slaves to work on new estates. They were 
driven so hard that thousands died. By 1515 there were perhaps 50,000 “Indians” 
left. By 1550 there were 500. A report of the year 1650 showed none of the 
original Arawaks or their descendents were left in the Bahamas. 
  
These and other blood curdling facts are chronicled by historian, playwright 
and social activist Howard Zinn in his “A People’s History of the United 
States”, a 1980 book re-issued in 2005 as a classic. With extensive research, 
it tells the story of the systematic decimation of America’s native 
populations. 
  
How did the story develop after the blood and gore of the early explorers? 
Thomas Jefferson who wrote the stirring words of the Declaration of 
Independence (“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are 
created equal”) was the owner of several hundred slaves. Andrew Jackson who 
later became President was a major beneficiary of a policy called “removal of 
Indians” which helped him acquire thousands of acres of land. 
  
Has the story been any different in our own times? In 1969 when America’s war 
in Vietnam was already looking like a lost cause, Henry Kissinger had an 
original brainwave. He ordered carpet-bombing of Cambodia, a neutral country. 
The indiscriminate bombing went on for 14 months, resulting in 600,000 recorded 
deaths. But Kissinger kept it a secret from the American Congress and the 
American people. That explains the title of another 2005 book “Lying for 
Empire: How to commit war crimes with a straight face” by David Model. 
  
Despite that last-minute murder spree, Kissinger lost Vietnam. He also lost 
Cambodia by driving hundreds of peasants to join the underground Khmer Rouge 
who defeated a puppet government America had put in place in Cambodia. 
  
Sounds familiar? Isn’t what we see today an unchanging continuation of what 
Columbus started, and was then car ried on by the Founding Fathers of America, 
then by the Presidents of America who attacked Korea, attacked Vietnam, 
Cambodia and Laos, arranged assassinations (example, Allende’s Chile) and 
military coups (example, Indonesia) and modern high-tech wars (example, Iraq)? 
  
When Saddam Hussain was hanged and his corpse desecrated, the world thought 
that the most unjustified war of modern times would at last end. But Mr Bush is 
sending 20,000 more American soldiers to Iraq to join the 130,000 already there 
in a policy called “Surge.” Violation of a corpse is against the religion of 
the man who was hanged and the man who engineered the hanging. Mr Bush thus 
defied religion, then defied world opinion, defied American public opinion, and 
defied the advice of several American military experts and Republican party 
leaders in intensifying the Iraq war. 
  
Mr Bush may be off his rocker. But he remains in sync with American history. 
That’s the danger. For our todays and tomorrows.
   
   
   

 
---------------------------------
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go 
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.

Reply via email to