--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [mercy snip]
> > The safest way to assess who should be in charge is to > > consider who can deliver what we want. > > > > There seems to exist a number of alternatives (of varying > > probability): > > (1) The GWB White House is paralyzed by democratic sniping > > (2) The GWB White House continues > > (3) GWB is assassinated and Cheney takes over > > (4) GWB and Cheney are assassinated and the Democrats take over > > Funny, you left out the alternative we were > actually talking about: GWB is impeached and > convicted by Democrats and Republicans, and > a much-chastened Cheney takes over (or Cheney > resigns and Pelosi takes over). That's number two - the alternative that for the meaningful future will paralyze the executive government. [snip] > > > JStein - at this point in time in the way global > > events unfold, do you really have the luxury of > > indulging in petty vengeances? > > We sure don't. But then I wasn't the one who > suggested assassination, you were. > Life has become too short for others to clarify your intentional misunderstandings and/or remarkable stupidity. Consider yourself a lost cause.
