--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], > > "tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis" > > <tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@> wrote: > > > > > > Large S Self Knows Large S Self. What else do you need to Know. > > > > I can buy this one. I was speaking specifically to > > those who throw around the term 'enlightened' but > > who make no claim to be other than small s self. > > So far I liked MDixon's take on the question, and > > Curtis', and Alex's, and Bhairitu's, and Robert's, > > and new.morning's, and Jonathan's funny ones, and > > even Judy's, when she wasn't turning it into Yet > > Another Excuse To Trash Barry. :-) > > > > As for those who do, I reserve the right to make > > my own determination of whether their claims are > > true or not. For the record, in your case and in > > Rory's I'm willing to give you both the benefit of a > > doubt. > > Even though you've never met either of them in person?? LOL!
You failed to notice that I only give them the benefit of a doubt and cut them some slack. I didn't deem them enlightened. You (and I do mean small s you) are trying to turn that into a slam because I didn't include you. It wasn't an oversight.
