--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > You enjoy laughing at people who argue about topics > > > > > you raise that you don't care about? > > > > > > > > You may have a hope of getting it after all. :-) > > > > > > [Researching how to implement a troll filter in the Safari browse] > > > > Reminds me of a lowlife I went to school with who used to enjoy > > starting fights over CB radio... > > The topics themselves do not invite argument. > Some people bring argument to the topics because > they like to argue, that's all. Who could *not* > laugh at them? > > Look at the topic above, in the header to this > post. I posted it, inviting people to participate. > So far, the only person to post to it as if it > were a real topic was Rick. He posted a balanced, > reasonable "middle way" view of the question. > > On the other hand, look at what you (Jim), sparaig, > and Judy brought to the topic. All you could possibly > see in it was some kind of setup for a putdown, so > you turned it *into* a series of putdowns and argu- > ments. Again, who could *not* laugh at such people? >
My comment was in reference to the paraphrase of your words by sparaig and your acknowledgement of them. As to the topic, since I don't live in Fairfield, I have nothing to say about it.
