--- In [email protected], "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > On Jan 31, 2007, at 5:35 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > >> > > >> --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > >> <snip> > > >>> Then you probably won't like his memoir. But it may just be > > >>> the first published reference to the Pervarishi Effect > > >> > > >> Just so everyone is aware, by "Pervarishi Effect" > > >> Vaj is referring to his claim that MMY is a "pervert." > > >> > > > And obsessions with people who no longer cares about... > > > > It's always nice to see the truth revealed, however long it > > takes. Actually it probably should be Pervorishi: > > > > perv |pÉrv| |pÉrv| |pÉË?v| informal > > noun (also pervo |ËpÉrËvÅ?|) > > a sexual pervert. > > ORIGIN 1940s > > Why is it nice, assuming it is true?
And why should we assume it's true, given that Vaj is the only person to have made that claim?
