--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" 
> <jflanegi@> 
> > > wrote:
> > > <snip>
> > > > > I saw that stuff on the TM Free site, and was actually glad
> > > > > I did since I had not written down the effects of some of the 
> > > > > sutras and now have a copy for myself, should I ever decide 
> to 
> > > > > practice them again.
> > > > 
> > > > So much for innnocence of the practice
> > > 
> > > As I recall, the effects of the sutras are taught as
> > > part of the course.
> > 
> > Ignoring this part, Judy:
> > 
> > > , and keeping things in conciousness rather than 
> > > > writing them down...
> 
> Thought they were two different aspects.  Not sure
> what "innocence" has to do with keeping things in
> consciousness rather than writing them down.  Thought
> you meant we're supposed to be "innocent" with regard
> to what the effects are, which ain't the case.
>

In this case, I mean trying to second-guess what you're supposed to be 
doing/expecting, 
by going by OTHER people's memories...


Reply via email to