Doug,
Thanks for letting us know that several Persons of Importance- i.e.,
journalists and
professors- in the last week sought your perspective about 'Fairfield
happenings', 'Kansas',
'what David Lynch is about', 'whether Lynch is 'on the level', and thank you
for letting us
know that you explained to the journalists and professors that you believe that
recent
publicity about TM is having far more effect effect on retaining the faithful
than on
increasing TM initiations.
It seems that the professors and the journalists who contacted you
might have
thought differently, and contacted you for reassurance of some sort. In any
event, thanks
for giving us on FFL a hint of the extent of your activities....
Despite your explanation to the journalists and professors, my own
take on the
recent publicity is that it is having a very positive effect to increase
acceptance of TM
among the massses, if not actual initiations.
mainstream20016
--- In [email protected], "dhamiltony2k5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], new.morning <no_reply@
>
>
> Yes, there is a commentary to make there about those numbers. The
> numbers probably say a whole lot more about things TMorg than just
> the ME.
>
> Last week journalists and professors were contacting me on the side
> wanting to know the story, "what is going on in Fairfield?" "What is
> the deal with the Kansas thing?" "What is David Lynch about? Is
> Lynch on the level?"
>
> These numbers are some of where i sent these people. And also some
> of the recent threads here on FFL to read.
>
> For the journalists, i pointed out that their publicity of what they
> may write is way more impportant inside the cult of the TMorg now
> than anything else it may or may not do for the TM movement to
> increase initiations for the movement. PR for holding the few
> hundred people inside together like the Wash Post and recent NYT
> articles are much mmore about the proving some validation to
> themselves inside up there. It is more about replay internally,
> reading them out as age of enlightenment things about themselves.
>
> One post i forwarded as a url from FFL here was that list of
> questions that the recent visitor to FF posed here on FFL, as the
> questions which the Washington Post travel-writer or the Washington
> Post DC corps did not ask.
>
> Also the posts about how the movement just takes PR of what is said
> and sanitizes it to their satisfaction and use it to their own end
> inside.
>
> In net it is way more complex to write about than a short article can
> do. I noticed the west coast dropped the interest in the Lynch-
> Donavan tour after it left the east coast.
>
>
> >
> > http://invincibleamerica.org/tallies.html
> >
> > Superradiance Tally by Date and Location
> > Date Location AM PM Location AM PM
> > 2 February Fairfield/MVC 1416 1632 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 1 February Fairfield/MVC 1451 1685 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 31 January Fairfield/MVC 1451 1718 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 30 January Fairfield/MVC 1473 1645 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 29 January Fairfield/MVC 1512 1746 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 28 January Fairfield/MVC 1374 1612 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 27 January Fairfield/MVC 1513 1631 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 26 January Fairfield/MVC 1527 1726 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 25 January Fairfield/MVC 1514 1804 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 24 January Fairfield/MVC 1498 1782 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 23 January Fairfield/MVC 1525 1685 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 22 January Fairfield/MVC 1527 1773 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 21 January Fairfield/MVC 1322 1526 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 20 January Fairfield/MVC 1490 1670 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 19 January Fairfield/MVC 1474 1699 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 18 January Fairfield/MVC 1524 1795 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 17 January Fairfield/MVC 1473 1818 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 16 January Fairfield/MVC 1447 1767 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 15 January Fairfield/MVC 1385 1731 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 14 January Fairfield/MVC 1399 1542 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 13 January Fairfield/MVC 1553 1645 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 12 January Fairfield/MVC 1718 1910 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 11 January Fairfield/MVC 1589 1890 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 10 January Fairfield/MVC 1580 1906 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 9 January Fairfield/MVC 1608 1863 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 8 January Fairfield/MVC 1588 1849 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 7 January Fairfield/MVC 1487 1710 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 6 January Fairfield/MVC 1551 1753 Washington, D.C.
>
> > 5 January Fairfield/MVC 1584 1847 Washington, D.C.
>
> >
>
