--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], bob_brigante > > <no_reply@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The youthful-looking Evonne, who leads an active life of > > > > > > > walking, bicycle riding, rollerblading, and dancing, > said > > > > > > > that when she was 22 she was looking for a way to > > > > > > > 'revolutionize her life', and was introduced to the > > > > > > > Transcendental Meditation Technique. > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmmm. 70 now, 22 then, that makes 48 years ago. > > > > > > Where was Maharishi teaching TM in 1959? > > > > > > > > > > LA > > > > > > > > It's really quite striking how the strident TM critics > > > > here are so threatened by the notion that a woman might > > > > have found TM beneficial and is willing to say so in > > > > public that they have to try to find ways to impugn her > > > > integrity (in one particularly unfortunate case, using > > > > frankly racist language to do so). > > > > > > > > Say, Jim, is this what you think of when you talk about > > > > "a deep commitment to spiritual discovery and > > > > integration" that "binds us all"? > > > > > > > Yep. > > > > OK. I choose not to be bound to that kind of moral > > vacuity, so please leave me out of any future lists > > of bindees you may want to post. > > > Just ignore it or strenuously object or try to argue with me about > it-- this is a public forum. There have been times when people have > requested rules applied to various postings- Barry and new morning > come to mind, and nothing came of it. I too tried to shut down one > poster here recently, and nothing came of it either. Applying rules > here just doesn't work, and a good thing too.
My request stands as I stated it.
