--- In [email protected], Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > nablusos108 wrote: > > > > > >>> I have no strong opinion on Heaven or Hell. Perhaps those states > >>> > > of > > > >>> Bliss and Tamas excist, perhaps not. But if Hell excists I think > >>> > > this > > > >>> Paul Mason fellow is a strong candidate for a prolonged stay in > >>> > > one > > > >>> of those premises. I mean, spreading slander about an outstanding > >>> Saint for money ?? It's like a plea for a stay in an unpleasant > >>> place. IMO. To be subdued and treated by Tamas for a long period > >>> > > of > > > >>> time at least is a guarantee for not having to deal with this > >>> > > lowlife > > > >>> fellow in our next incarnation. > >>> > > > > > >> So why didn't Maharishi teach us mantra shastra? > >> > > > > Thats an interesting question. IMO Maharishi has from day one been > > rather demanding; take this knowledge without explanation or do > > something else. Either you trust him, or you do not. Those who > > trusted him and followed Maharishis suggestions never needed any > > shastras, it simply just worked. > > > > > But teachers should know how it works. Mantra Shastra is the science of > mantras. >
Why? The mantra-selection was rote. Assuming it has any validity at all, why do they need to know more than what they learned?
