--- In [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 2/18/07 1:05:31 P.M. Central Standard Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Any meditating structural engineers out there who can offer a view on > the probability of the twin towers collapsing in the freefall > hollywodesquelly neat way they did simply by crashing two airplanes > into them? > > > > I'm not a structural engineer but on 60 minutes they did a program , I > believe before 911, stating how dangerous high rise buildings could be because of > the collapsing pancake effect like we saw in the twin towers. It was a > structural problem that had to be overcome to prevent such a collapse under > *normal* conditions. They showed video of high rise building being built that > collapsed without anything such as an explosion or aircraft hitting them. Now add > an aircraft hitting a building at several hundred miles per hour, intense heat > that softens the steel structure and rivets that hold it together and the > impact of one floor falling on top of another and there you have it. OBL is an > engineer and new of this problem with high rise buildings. >
Well, that's just the final proof of how deep this conspiracy runs: before taking down the Twin Towers, the conspirators first planted in the public domain the 'explanation' to how it could happen the way it didn't.
