--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > > > > > andrewcohen.org <http://www.wie.org/_e/ui/ac/ac-logo.gif> > > > > > > > > Quote of the Week > > > > > > > > What Does Enlightenment Look Like? > > > <snip> > > > > I believe that higher state experiences, if they are to > > > > mean anything at all, must translate into significant > > > > changes in all the important domains of human life. > > > > > > How can it translate into *predictable* changes > > > if the course of action, per Krishna in the Gita, > > > is unfathomable? > > > > > > > But he doesn't really define it the way Krishna does. > > Who doesn't, and what are the two ways it's defined?
Andrew Cohen doesn't. He defines it as "higher state experiences" [that must "mean" something]. Krishna defines enlightenment as being established in Him, or Being.
