"completed Jews."

I don't know how they get the foreskin back on but that's gotta hurt!

I never took the time to really connect the vague prophesies in the
Old Testament with the New claims to notice how they fail even by
their own criteria.  I usually get hung up on the miracles.  The weird
thing is that even if you definitively pointed all this out,the
Christian just drops back and punts.  "Well it is just a matter of faith".



--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" 
> <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> >
> > Sista soul Ja lays it down.  Who else has read both of the relevant
> > scriptures?  Well me for one, but you get my point!  
> > 
> > Most of the New Testiment is based on making the case of Jesus'
> > divinity through miricles and fullfullment of prophesy.  Nice one 
> > Judy.
> 
> Thanks.  I ain't no Bible scholar, but the fundamental
> dishonesty of Christianity regarding Judaism, in the
> Gospels and Paul's epistles, just infuriates me.  The
> toll it's taken on Jews for the past 2,000 years is
> beyond appalling.
> 
> And so many Christian proselytizers are either ignorant
> about Judaism or deliberately take advantage of some
> Jews' ignorance of their own religion to make their
> case.  (Not referring to MDixon here; he's more
> knowledgeable than I am and doesn't seem like the
> proselytizing type.)
> 
> The ultimate outrage along these lines is the phrase
> evangelical/fundamentalist Christians use to refer
> to Jews who have converted to Christianity: "completed
> Jews."  I hope I never hear such a Christian use the
> phrase "live," because I'd either burst a blood
> vessel or burst one of his, or both.
> 
> 
> > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In [email protected], MDixon6569@ wrote:
> > > >
> > > >  
> > > > In a message dated 2/20/07 1:01:42 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
> > > > jstein@ writes:
> > > > 
> > > > And just  as Joseph revealed his circumcision to his 
> > > > brothers to prove 
> > > > > who  he was, Christ will reveal to the Jews the scars in his 
> > > > hands, feet and  
> > > > > side to prove who he was when he returns.
> > > > 
> > > > I don't think that's  likely to do the trick, actually.
> > > > For Jews there are more important issues  involved.
> > > > 
> > > > No , that will not be what makes them accept him as Messiah,
> > > > but will show them that  he was Jesus.
> > > 
> > > Anybody can have scars on their hands and feet
> > > and side.
> > > 
> > > The problem with Jesus as Messiah is that he
> > > clearly wasn't the Messiah prophesied to the Jews
> > > in the Hebrew Scriptures.  Among other things,
> > > The prophesied Messiah will be a human being, not
> > > God. And it's blasphemy in Judaism to say a human
> > > being is divine.  The High Priest wasn't ripping
> > > his garments just for dramatic effect.
> > > 
> > > I know the response to this is that the Jews have
> > > misunderstood their own scriptures, but that's
> > > just insulting.  It's no wonder knowledgeable Jews
> > > aren't interested.
> > > 
> > > I'm not saying Jesus wasn't a Really Big Deal, just
> > > that Christians ought to leave the Jews the frack
> > > alone about him and worry about their own salvation.
> > > If God wants His Chosen People to turn to Jesus,
> > > He'll find a way to do it, but I seriously doubt it's
> > > going to look like a parallel between Bible stories.
> > > And He's got a whole lot of 'splainin' to do.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to