--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> > > wrote: > > <snip> > > > Actually, it just might be quite entertaining to see the guy talk > > > himself out of that corner :-) > > > > I imagine there are various word games he can > > play, but they'll look awfully cute beside his > > accusations that *Lawson* was playing word games. > > I try NOT to play word games because, given my ADHD, I'm so > darned lousy at it. I can, with luck, catch others' word games, > but keeping track of my own inconsistencies and not mess up on > a regular basis? Not a chance.
What Andrew was referring to as your word games was your catching him in them. <snip> > > I wonder if the National Association of Science > > Writers has an appropriate public forum... > > Oh, bother. It's not worth it. As far as I know, as long > as he's not posting about TM or New Age related stuff (or > teaching journalism in China), he's a perfectly fine > journalist. That's a little like saying it's not worth prosecuting a rapist as long as he doesn't rape again. He isn't a "fine journalist" if he "adjusts" the facts to promote his own agenda. And he has a lot of agendas, not just New Age/paranormal/TM stuff. Who knows whose otherwise upstanding reputation and career he'll ruin next with malicious innuendo and deliberately misleading "exposes"?
