--- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Sure speaks volumes about the value of TM, eh? > > > > > > > > > > Just volumes about you, you m¤%&/%&"#g satanist > > > > > > > > Wow. Peter's not only paranoid and near-incoherent, > > > > he can't even spell m¤%&ÐŦэ"#g right. > > > > > > > > > > A wonderful example of how people who are proven wrong may react: (1) > > > in their reply censor out the stuff that prove them to be lying, > > > cheating bastards harbouyring ulterior motives; (2) attempt to attack > > > the messenger. > > > > > > The way to do it, is (1) to defeat someone with logic; AND (2) finish > > > them off with a literary coup de grace. > > > > > > So, TB, you are a m¤%&/%&"#g satanist aught lying and you should put a > > > knife to your m¤%&ÐŦэ"#g scrotum, thus sparing humanity > > > further genetic contamination. > > > > > > > Um, Peter, you're still banned from Wikipedia, are you not? > > > > No. > > Why do you ask? >
Just that little exchange above would result in banning.
