--- In [email protected], "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.financialexpress.com/fe_full_story.php?content_id=155693
>

Quoting: "Each guru has a well-defined set of followers. There are 
hardly any overlaps and fewer instances of cannibalization where one 
guru weans away followers from another. For example, one would be 
hard-pressed to find, say, a follower of both Sri Sri Ravishankar and 
Osho. Or of a Baba Ramdev and Mata Amritanandamayi. Each segment is 
uniquely defined. "

No, how about TM being a gateway towards universalism as they grow 
out of the TMorg and Maharishi?   Evidently, see the directory of 
active spiritual practice groups in FF, for instance.  TM moved on.   

Out there in the world too is a whole TM movement that went on to sit 
with other gurus in serial.  Now, the old experienced meditating 
community in Fairfield is quite adept at this.  It has moved on.  In 
our own experience with it this has come to be what makes Fairfield 
such a special place to be in spiritually.  The old State of Iowa 
marketing motto has a lot of truth in it:  "Iowa, a place to grow".  

There in fact has been a lot of cross-pollenation between groups and 
Gurus.  Look at who actually are around the gurus administrating and 
often making the Gurus, often it has been us, the meditators of the 
old TM movement.
 
-Doug in FF
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/132348




Reply via email to