> That's a very gracious apology, but you might
> want to conside making one to the rest of us as
> well.  Several people *did* attempt to point out
> to Offworld that there was no such thing as a
> "flashbulb" supernova, yet you shrieked rather
> nastily at all of us for not having corrected
> him.
>

Okay, I apologize for that too.  Anyone else want a piece of this?

My frustration with this whole group is that scholarship is so spotty.
 You let the nuts get away with so much crap that besmirches sound
thinking -- because there's just so much "wrong" being displayed here
that you would have to spend your whole lives here trying to educate them.

And I haven't come up with a solution for this any more than the rest
of you.  That's why I've lurked for years -- why get into lose/lose
scenarios?  Look at what a mess I made of it responding to someone
pontificating about astronomy!  

And worst, sooner or later I will be pontificating just as badly and
be in denial about it.  

I'm about to post a long explanation of my present philosophy.  Maybe
it'll get something going here that I can be satisfied with.  We'll
see.  I'll take a chance.  

Edg


Reply via email to