--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I remain unconvinced that his followup techniques have been > > > > > successful. In fact, I'm fairly certain that they are not. > > > > > > > > I agree- not so they are working for him. He wouldn't feel such > > > > a need to denigrate TM if that were so. The only point of my > > > > comment is that loosening up the field of consciousness with > > > > TM will provide better results with almost anything. > > > > > > What is the sound of one mindless cow following the herd? > > > > > > Mu. > > > > So Barry, what is it that's gone wrong in your life > > today? > > I don't know. You're the person who is still up > compulsively stalking your "enemy"
As someone here observed quite recently, one thing that can be said in favor of paranoia is its entertainment value. on Fairfield > Life at 3:26 in the A.M., while I was having fun > over my morning coffee making up silly koans > about silly people. > > Which activity do you think more people would > regard as indicative of having something "wrong" > with one's life, eh? :-) You've been *very* entertaining lately, just not quite the way you think. > > Does a Buddha have dog nature? > > Woof. >
