--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <jflanegi@>
wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], MDixon6569@ wrote:
> > >
> > > In a message dated 2/25/07 5:26:53 P.M. Central Standard
Time,
> > > matrixmonitor@ writes:
> > > >
> > > > --Excellent advice, real practical!. Just move to another
> > > > planet.
> > >
> > > I thought that SV buildings were to minimize the use of metal
> > > in them yet the Peace Palaces being built in Navasota Texas
> > > are built with a steel frame. The roofs have composite
shingles.
> > > Shouldn't they be clay tile and the siding 8 inch thick sun
> > > dried brick?
> >
> > Better tear 'em down and start over...;-)
>
>
> Good idea. But as a matter of practicality this
> will have to wait until they've torn down Washington,
> D.C., New York, Paris, and all those other non-SV
> places.
>
> This delay can be considered Support Of Nature, because
> the owners will have time to raise the money to have
> their SV houses built "right" a second time.
>
Ironic as hell, but when I helped build the Kansas City Capital of
the A of E, the building was completed facing SOUTH! This was in '79-
80, before all the SV stuff came out.