--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Feb 26, 2007, at 5:24 PM, peterklutz wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Feb 26, 2007, at 12:38 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: > >> > >>> I'm not quite sure what 'Jack Chick tracts' are myself, > >>> but I'm pretty sure I've seen the technique you describe > >>> above. It looks a lot like the following, doesn't it? > >> > >> Two personal favs, the first one might've be co-written by Peter > >> Klutz: > >> > >> http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0093/0093_01.asp > >> > >> http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0070/0070_01.asp > >> > > > > I knew my last postings must have hit their target when you started to > > send emails to me personally, one of which was a premature ejaculation > > (nothing in it) and the other a short incoherent thing reminiscent of: > > Not really. But they deserved a good joke--and for me that's what > Jack Chick's tracts are: comedy. > > So try to laugh a little and enjoy it all Peter. >
I'll do that as soon as you find the time to answer the questions you so conveniently disappeared from your reply: The question: >... the Christian in your cartoon makes a number of >statements about Freemasonry. > >Feel free to clarify/comment on them. >
