--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Feb 26, 2007, at 7:08 PM, peterklutz wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > > This is: "What is your Freemasonic lodge's version of 
Gnosis?"
> > > >
> > > > It's a simple question.
> > > >
> > > > Why can't you just answer it? :-)
> > > 
> > > In the experience emblematic of light, as the sun rising in
> > > the east.  Universal Light.
> > 
> > Translation: Vaj doesn't have a clue.
> 
> Remembering my "gang of ducks" analogy this morning,
> doesn't it give you pause sometimes how the desire
> to "pile on" and beat up someone they don't like is
> more powerful in some of the quackers here than the 
> desire to disassociate themselves from someone that 
> even *they* know is crazy?
<snip>

Kinda changes your sorry ass perspective when the shoe's on the 
other foot, doesn't it? In any case, you seem to need an explanation 
for everything. Why is that? Why do you feel a compulsion to "make 
sense" of the ever changing dynamics on this forum? Hardly seems 
like the "blithe Autumn leaves" approach, now doesn't it? What you 
say most of the time is designed more for effect than substance 
anyway.

This forum was a lot more fun for you when you would just spin your 
BS and draw all sorts of facile conclusions about TMers, calling 
them just about anything. Then, you got called on your spiritual 
Dadaism, and FFL just ain't been the same since for you. Too bad. I 
feel for you, but reality being what it is, you have no choice but 
to just DEAL WITH IT :-) )-:  

Reply via email to