--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mar 1, 2007, at 9:39 AM, sparaig wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], "vajradhatu108" > > <vajranatha@> wrote: > >> > >> --- In [email protected], "peterklutz" <peterklutz@> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> === caveat lector === > >>> > >> After an exchange of postings it has become evident that the > >> poster named Peter Klutz > > really > >> is one. The New World Order is offering a reward for his capture > >> and successful > >> deprogramming. Please contact your local representative for > >> further details. > >> > > > > So what you're saying is that Peter bothers you, even though you > > know he has problems. > > It was a joke sparaig. Interestingly a couple of people here always > seem to miss the jokes--what's THAT about? > > Of course you could be right and the message could have been about a > global cabal of rich bankers and freemasons and industrialists who > are really out to get Peter and they should contact the > representatives of this global org presumably available to all of us > in our very cities and villages. > > No, I look at Klutz's posts generally as funny but sad at the same > time. I'm typically not real keen on people who are against universal > tolerance and who are anti-Masons, bigots or wild conspiracy > theorists. But you do see a lot of that more and more here, whether > it's a Neo-Nazi or a TM-Nazi. >
I prefer to confront people with problems head-on, rather than make jokes at their expense. If I feel that I can't do any good by confronting them, I keep quiet rather than make jokes at their expense. You, on the other hand, appear to prefer to make jokes at their expense. What's up with that?
