--- In [email protected], "curtisdeltablues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My first response seems to have been eaten my the Yahoo monster.
That's happening a lot today. I think it's a new "feature." > I think I read him right. It is a myth. See > what happens to the second striker: > > http://youtube.com/watch?v=9QNmx1v2I0Q Indeed. It's amusing (to say the least) to read what those who have never really practiced the martial arts believe about them. A great martial artist does NOT go "off balance" when he strikes. Nor does the sequence of the strikes have anything to do with who winds up on the floor and who walks away. As for the "stay out of a fight" argument proposed by Sparaig and Peter Klutz, one is tempted to ask WHY, if they find the things that people say here to be "first strikes" against them, they have chosen to hang out on a forum that -- according to its charter -- is announced as a place where such strikes against assumption and rigid belief are de rigeur? To paraphrase Sparaig, it would appear to me that they're saying that there was no way to avoid the fights, when they them- selves made the choice to hang out in a biker bar.
