--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <no_reply@> > > wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > How they'll end everything and explain it all > > > > > away is still a mystery. My hope is that they'll > > > > > be cool enough not to bow to pressure from the > > > > > rationalists in the audience and NEVER explain > > > > > it. That would enable the show to go down in TV > > > > > history, as opposed to being just a curiosity. > > > > > > > > "Twin Peaks" was there first, actually. > > > > > > Yup, and only 23 years after "The Prisoner." :-) > > > > "The Prisoner" was canceled after only a dozen or so > > episodes. "Twin Peaks" ran for three years. > > And was a ghastly exercise in self indulgence > for all three of them. Whereas "The Prisoner" > had wit and style and some semblance of coherence. > > But that's all just opinion and preference. I tend > to prefer good writing and acting and plotting and > for you the fact that a TMer was associated with > a film or TV series seems to be enough. :-) > > By the way, did you actually *watch* "Twin Peaks," > or are you doing another "Apocalypto" number? :-) > > > In any case, "Lost" isn't unique in leaving the > > mystery/ies unsolved. > > Uh...you seem to have forgotten how to read as well. > It is not even clear that "Lost" WILL leave things > unexplained. In my post I was only expressing my > hope that it will. >
The best way to go is to explain the mysteries in such a way as to raise new questions.
