February 7, 2007
  To: Chiefs of police
  DISTRICT ATTORNEY DANE COUNTY
  RE:       Drug Investigations And Prosecutions
  Please allow me to use a memo to briefly summarize several policy positions 
of this office in the area of drug enforcement. The occasion for this memo is 
the continuing reduction in attorney staffing in this office due to the loss of 
federal grants. I will be happy to address any questions about the following at 
the next Chief’s meeting scheduled for February 15, 2007 .
  Marijuana Possession and Paraphernalia Cases 
  We are adjusting our prosecution policy in the area of THC possession, so 
that we will not charge criminally possession of fewer than 25 grams of THC, 
regardless of the defendant’s prior criminal history. For jurisdictions that 
have a municipal court and an ordinance, we encourage you to issue ordinance 
citations. Those agencies that lack a municipal court or ordinance will not 
have such an option. You may continue to submit THC possession cases to this 
office. We will be issuing them as County Ordinance violations.
  Similarly, we will be declining cases of possession of drug paraphernalia 
related to use of marijuana. If your municipality has an ordinance, please do 
not submit those cases to this office. Otherwise, you may continue to do so. We 
are working with the county to create an paraphernalia ordinance. Until we do, 
we will either decline or issue as a related ordinance.
  Drug Prosecutions Generally
  Shrinking resources also require that we raise the bar on the quantum of 
evidence in all cases. We will not issue charges unless evidence is presented 
at the time of referral of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that 
when controlled substances are not found on a person, but rather in a car or 
dwelling, there must be strong evidence of a link to a particular person or 
persons. Also, evidence from confidential informants will not be relied on 
unless corroborated by credible evidence. In short, cases with marginal proof 
will be declined.
  We do not make these choices lightly. We appreciate that today’s marijuana is 
extremely potent, and that its excessive use can and does damage lives. We also 
know the difficulties you face in gathering evidence of crime, especially 
chronic drug use and trafficking, and the harms that this conduct creates for 
individuals, families and communities. We are, however, constrained by our 
resources to scrutinize more closely the kind and quality of the cases we issue.
  Thank you for your continuing cooperation with this office in our shared 
missions of law enforcement and public protection. As always, I invite any 
concerns, questions, or suggestions you might have in any of these areas.
  BRIAN W. BLANCHARD
  District Attorney
  JUDY SCHWAEMLE
  Deputy District Attorney

 
---------------------------------
Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers and get answers from real people 
who know.

Reply via email to