--- In [email protected], "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "sparaig" <sparaig@> wrote: > > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mar 5, 2007, at 7:38 PM, peterklutz wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Returning to this wonderful post by Michael Dean Goodman: > > > > > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/131314 > > > > > > > > What exactly has been said about the final stages of the > process of > > > > moving from feeling, my-ness, am-ness, is-ness to the Absolute? > > > > > > > > > It's a rather poor sketch of samkhya, the basis for the yoga > sutras. > > > Samkhya is the structure of CC. But it doesn't end there. Where > > > samkhya leaves off, the Nyaya-Vaisheshika school picks up. Once > these > > > are understood, then one could understand how these relate to > direct > > > experience in terms of the yoga sutra. They are only given in a > crude > > > sketch form in M's "Vedic Science". In the original, pure way > this > > > knowledge is given, it is very detailed and should be learned > from a > > > master of this tradition, not from newsgroups or email lists. > > > > > > Jai Guru Dev > > > > > > > > > Oh, right arm, Vaj. > > > Yes Vaj, continue to obscure Reality with lots of intellectualizing > and nitpicking...I can't think of much that is less practical than > that...however, to each his own. >
Vaj isn't intellectualizing - he's just bullshitting. By the evidence fwd by himself on this list Vaj really doesn't know what TM is about. Even by rhetorical standards his post is just bs. He is criticizing a teaching e knows nothing about by sniping at a second hand reference to a post offering a brief summary of what Maharishi ones said on a tape. It's just plain silly draped in a thick layer of pompous-ness. Hey, maybe we should revise MDG's summary to include Pompous-ness in the scheme? I wonder where it would go?
