--- In [email protected], Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mar 7, 2007, at 2:32 PM, Mr. Magoo wrote: > > > --- In [email protected], Vaj <vajranatha@> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Mar 7, 2007, at 2:07 PM, Mr. Magoo wrote: > >> > >>> "Some Mahayana Buddhist sutras and a number of Buddhist tantras, > >>> however, strongly insist upon the ultimate Reality of the Atman when > >>> it is equated with the essential and eternal being of the Buddha" > >>> (Wikipedia)...I think I'll pass on this one VAj, it seems a bit of a > >>> conundrum! At least it appears 'you're' not mixed up. :-) > >> > >> > >> But of course, this is not what His Bobness was referring to... :-) > > > > Correct....think I'll pass. :-) P.S. Still a long ways to go to get a > > drink of water, no matter how you crack it. Atman has Sanskrit origins > > with a specific meaning, I think I'll stick with that. > > > Yes, a Hindu caped guy in spandex with a Ampersand on his chest. >
I can see it now: Dr. Jai Maharaj deconstructing "Atman" at Hindu temples across the country, in the style of Weinstein Simcha, the author of _Up, up and Oy Vey!_ http://www.rabbisimcha.com/pages/book.html
