--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Haven't you > > > > > > > > ever considered the possibility that some of > > > > > > > > your close friends follow your exploits on > > > > > > > > the Internet without making any posts of > > > > > > > > their own, and laugh at you behind your > > > > > > > > back? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, let me consider it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nope, I don't have any "friends" like that. > > > > > > > > > > > > I can definitely confirm that you have > > > > > > at least one. > > > > > > > > > > Peculiar definition of "Friend." > > > > > > > > And not just a "friend," but a "*close* friend," > > > > according to Barry. > > > > > > I never said that. > > > > Yes, you did. It's right up there at the top. > > Read it again. I *asked* whether you had ever > considered the possibility. I didn't say that > the person I exchanged emails with was close > to you.
Yes, you did. I said I had no "friends" like that (i.e., close friends), and you claimed I had at least one. > > > Just someone who has met > > > you in person, and with whom I exchanged quite > > > a few emails. Most of them were *not* concerning > > > you (you're just not that important), but we > > > definitely shared a few laughs at your expense. > > > > Barry, it's not working. You're just digging > > yourself in deeper. > > Keep thinking about it, Judy. You'll figure it > out one of these days. :-) Good grief, Barry, stop embarrassing yourself. The ploy isn't working, and you're just making yourself look worse and worse.
