--- In [email protected], "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Really, really good article in today's NY Times > magazine on current cosmological theory, just > beautifully written. Excerpt: > [...] > All well and good. Science is full of homo sapiens-humbling insights. > But the trade-off for these lessons in insignificance has always been > that at least now we would have a deeper simpler understanding of > the universe. That the more we could observe, the more we would know. > But what about the less we could observe? What happens to new > knowledge then? It's a question cosmologists have been asking > themselves lately, and it might well be a question we'll all be > asking ourselves soon, because if they're right, then the time has > come to rethink a fundamental assumption: When we look up at the > night sky, we're seeing the universe. > > Not so. Not even close.... > > > > http://tinyurl.com/3bdbd5 >
John Hagelin has been obsessed with dark matter and dark energy for quite some time now. He's convinced that our "higher self" is composed of this kind of stuff.
