jstein wrote: > The *fact* is that Clinton did *far* more than > Bush to attempt to protect the U.S. from terrorism. > Clinton was obsessed with the threat. Bush ignored > it. > This isn't mere spin - it's full-scale invention, if not a lie!
"The man who was in the Soviet Union demonstrating against the American military during Vietnam, who as President left our armed forces short on so many fronts, now is - in his own 20/20 hindsight - The Defense President. Now he criticizes the Bush Administration for not doing enough, proclaims himself the champion of effective military action, and implies none too subtly that the fight against terrorism would go better if we had a Clinton in the White House instead of a Bush. This isn't mere spin. It's full-scale invention." Read more: 'Bill Clinton: Play It as It Lies' By Ronald A. Cass http://tinyurl.com/njxwd
