--- In [email protected], "llundrub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 
> > I am NOT trying to convince you that I am "right" -- I'm
> > probably NOT, since I have been "right" about so few things
> > in my life (and I'm not even convinced that "I" exists). 
> > I am NOT trying to convince you that your way of seeing 
> > things -- about pundits or about how to choose one's 
> > actions -- is "wrong." For all I know, your way of seeing 
> > these things may be FAR more "correct" than mine, if such 
> > a thing as "correct" exists. I'm just expressing my 
> > OPINION, dude. You may do the same.
> 
> ------Your not right. 

But wait. I never claimed TO be "right."  :-)

> What you stated was not your opinion...

Ah, but it was. How you saw it is your business.

I leave you to that business. Have a nice day. And
if it turns out to be less than a nice day, come
back and reread this stuff and notice how you 
started it. I made NO claim of "superior knowledge,"
but YOU DO. I made NO ATTEMPT to "intimidate," but
YOU HAVE. I mentioned NONE of the techniques you seem 
to be "correcting" me on below. Mote. Eye. Watch
where you're casting. :-)

> ...it was your attempt to intimidate through supposed 
> superior knowledge, but that knowledge was merely copied 
> from someone else.  Moreover, "adjust ones actions" is 
> not the method of vipassana. Nor of shamatha. Rather, 
> Shamatha is calm abiding, what TM er's call Samadhi, 
> and vippassana is the method of gaining Buddha's insight 
> into ones aggregated nature to discern the meaning of the 
> words of the Buddha from the Nikaya standpoint.  Neither 
> is used for 'adjusting' ones behavior, but rather is used 
> for discerning ones behavior. If that leads to 'adjustments' 
> then that's great, if not, then that's great. Don't attempt 
> to try to understand a Tantric Buddhist. At any rate, not with
> your superficial Buddhist patronymics.

By the way, with regard to your use of the word 
'patronymic' above, I refer you to the film "The
Princess Bride": 

[Vizzini cuts the rope but The Dread Pirate Roberts is 
still climbing up]

Vizzini: HE DIDN'T FALL? INCONCEIVABLE.

Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word. I do not think 
it means what you think it means.



Reply via email to