--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > Thanks for confirming just about everything > > I've said, Barry, including in your compiled > > quotes. Open-and-shut case. > > I think so. In every quote, you were commenting on ME > (or Rick, or some other of your "enemies" here), not > on any of the issues I/we raised.
Er, Barry, I wasn't the one who selected the quotes. You rarely even > *bother* to address any of the actual points I raise > any more; you just use them as a springboard to attack > ME again. > > In the case of the blurb I wrote about the discrimination > technique I described today, you seem to not even *diagree* > with it. What you did was use it as an excuse to attack > my character and ME again. Look again. The posts in which I criticize your character are the ones you *notice*. You don't even bother to read the others. > So did Lawson. ( Llundrub at > least had the courtesy to disagree with *what* I said, > *before* having a bash at ME. :-) So did I. > Do you honestly feel that this trend -- and it IS a trend; > ask anyone here, including your supporters -- reflects > well upon all that you've supposedly learned from Maharishi > and your own TM practice for over thirty years? What I say and do reflects *me*, not anybody or anything else. Most of all, they reflect my disgust with hypocrisy and dishonesty. It's no wonder you're desperate to silence me. And speaking of hypocrisy, I might point out that you yourself admitted a day or two ago that most of your posts are attacks on TMers, not on the TMO or MMY. > > If so, I wish you a long and happy life pursuing this > trend, and hope that it takes you where you think it will. > Me, I have my doubts that you'll end up where -- and as > what -- you're expecting.
