--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > And speaking of hypocrisy, I might point out that > > you yourself admitted a day or two ago that most > > of your posts are attacks on TMers, not on the TMO > > or MMY. > > What I believe I said is that my attacks, when I make > them, are against *individual* TMers. People I consider > sad, such as yourself, Peter Klutz, Nablus, and occas- > ional others as their comments here merit. It's YOU who > is trying to portray that as attacks on "TMers as a group."
You do both, actually. But, of course, I've never said you do one *rather than* the other; you made that up, as usual. Nor do I even use the phrase "TMers as a group"--you made that up as well and disingenuously put it in quotes as if those were my words. I do frequently refer to "TMers on this forum" as the targets of your chronic bashing compulsion. Or I don't specify either way, since, as noted, you bash both individual TMers *and* TMers as a group. In this case I was referring to your bashing individuals on this forum. > And I doubt that I ever said that "most" of my posts > were of this nature. But I might have. "Perhaps you could do us all a favor and compile a list of the posts I have made since the start of this calendar year that bash TM, the TMO, or Maharishi. I'm curious myself (and besides, I love to assign you 'make work' projects), because as far as I can tell, I have primarily been bashing *individuals* such as yourself and the other people whose words I have been collecting in the THINGS TMers BELIEVE series" (March 6). I suggest that you > go back and reread everything I've ever written here > on FFL -- carefully -- and find the quote in which you > think I said it. And then you can post it here. Just did. But all I had to do was search for the word "January," which appeared later in that post: "YOU are the person who keeps claiming that all I do here is bash TM, the TMO, and Maharishi. Put up or shut up. "Besides, then you'll have to re-read everything I've written since January 1st of this year, won't you? And you just *know* how you'll love doing that." As noted, I didn't have to reread anything. And, as noted, I've never said that was "all" you do. Bottom line: Another post full of lies from Barry, in an attempt to change the subject and avoid addressing his own hypocrisy. Thanks again, Barry, for confirming what I've been saying. Think > how gleeful you'll be if you can find it. On the other > hand, think of how silly you'll feel when you can't. > > We're expecting a "book report" from you either way. :-) >
