--- In [email protected], TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In [email protected], "Richard J. Williams" > <willytex@> wrote: > > > > TurquoiseB wrote: > > > Judy Stein on "anti-TMers": > > > * They are all untrustworthy, without credibility. > > > * They all lie. > > > * They have concealed motives. > > > * They intend to do harm to peace-loving TMers. > > > * I am right about them, no matter what they say. > > > * You should agree with me *because* I am right. > > > * They are bad people. > > > * They deserve retribution, and soon. > > > > > > Judy Stein on Republicans: > > > * They are all untrustworthy, without credibility. > > > * They all lie. > > > * They have concealed motives. > > > * They intend to do harm to peace-loving Democrats. > > > * I am right about them, no matter what they say. > > > * You should agree with me *because* I am right. > > > * They are bad people. > > > * They deserve retribution, and soon. > > > > > > Coincidence, or indication of state of attention? > > > > Uncle - You forgot to mention Judy's suggestion on Usenet > > that the entire Bush administration should be shot. > > Yeah, but that was back then; these days I'm sure > that she'd opt for lethal injection.
Here's what I actually said, a little over two years ago: "The entire administration should be thrown in jail, if not put before a firing squad." (For semantics aficionados, the implication of "if not" here is a little ambiguous; what I meant to suggest was that they might *deserve* to be put before a firing squad, but that such a punishment was too extreme.) Shooting is > reserved for TM critics. > > :-) >
