--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > How many of the 93 Clinton appointees in 1993 were > > replaced by Bush in 2001? Bush could have fired all > > 93, so are these 8 the only changes he made out of > > 186 opportunities? Where's the scandal? > > > MDixon wrote: > > The real scandal was that Bush was trying to reach > > across the isle when he took office and didn't clear > > out all of the Clinton appointees when he should have. > > > So, when Clinton took office he fired ALL the U.S. Attorneys, > including the one from Arkansas that was probing his links to > Rostenkowski,
Rostenkowski was indicted a year later by a Clinton- appointed U.S. attorney. > but when Bush took office he fired NONE, No, he fired almost all of them. but Judy says > that almost all incoming presidents fire their U.S. Attorneys from > previous administrations, but now there is a scandal because Bush > fired eight who apparently weren't doing their jobs? The evidence is that they *were* doing their jobs. > So, why do you suppose that Judy didn't mention this? Didn't mention what, your misrepresentations? > > New York Times: Attorney General Janet Reno today demanded the prompt > resignation of all United States Attorneys, leading the Federal > prosecutor in the District of Columbia to suggest that the order could > be tied to his long-running investigation of Representative Dan > Rostenkowski, a crucial ally of President Clinton. > > 'Attorney General Seeks Resignations From Prosecutors' > By David Johnston > New York Times, Wednesday March 24, 1993 >
